Pay in installments of $6.99 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 9 - Nov 14
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
philodendron little apple variegated Philodendron 'Congo Apple' – Large-Leaf Self-Heading Apple GreenPhilodendron 'Congo Apple' Compact Self Heading Hybrid with Apple Green New Leaves Philodendron 'Congo Apple' is a hardy hybrid known for its adaptability and striking colour transitions. Young leaves unfurl in a light, apple green shade, giving the plant its name, before maturing to a rich, dark glossy green. With its large, leathery leaves and tidy, self heading habit, this cultivar is both resilient and decorative, making it a perfect choice for
Philodendron 'Congo Apple' – Compact Self-Heading Hybrid with Apple-Green New Leaves
Philodendron 'Congo Apple' is a hardy hybrid known for its adaptability and striking colour transitions. Young leaves unfurl in a light, apple-green shade, giving the plant its name, before maturing to a rich, dark glossy green. With its large, leathery leaves and tidy, self-heading habit, this cultivar is both resilient and decorative, making it a perfect choice for beginners and collectors alike.
Defining traits of 'Congo Apple'
- Colour shift: foliage emerges bright apple-green and matures to deep glossy green.
- Leaf form: broad, oval, leathery blades with a smooth finish.
- Growth habit: self-heading hybrid, forming an upright cluster without climbing.
- Ease of care: adapts well to a wide range of indoor environments.
Background and breeding
‘Congo Apple’ belongs to the Philodendron erubescens hybrid group, selected for its compact, architectural growth and striking apple-green juvenile leaves. Like its relatives in the Congo series, it maintains a self-heading habit, making it an easy-care ornamental for indoor spaces.
Care guide for Philodendron 'Congo Apple'
- Light: thrives in bright, indirect light but tolerates medium light well.
- Temperature: prefers 20 – 28 °C; avoid prolonged exposure below 16 °C.
- Humidity: adapts to average indoor humidity but grows best at 60 – 75%.
- Watering: allow the top 2 – 3 cm of substrate to dry between waterings; do not overwater.
- Substrate: chunky, well-draining aroid mix with bark, coco coir, and perlite.
- Feeding: monthly, balanced fertiliser during the active growth season keeps foliage vibrant.
Common issues and solutions
- Yellowing leaves: often caused by waterlogged soil; improve drainage and adjust watering.
- Brown tips: usually linked to low humidity or irregular watering cycles.
- Slow growth: typical in low light; move to a brighter position to encourage activity.
- Pests: inspect young leaves for mites or thrips; manage promptly with IPM methods.
Collector’s notes
- Visual appeal: the apple-green flush of new leaves adds brightness to indoor displays.
- Comparison: shares the compact form of other Congo hybrids but with a lighter, fresher leaf tone.
- Beginner-friendly: one of the most forgiving self-heading philodendrons.
- Toxicity: philodendrons contain calcium oxalate; keep away from pets and children.
Etymology
Genus:Philodendron (Schott, 1830), derived from Greek philo- “loving” + dendron “tree,” describing its natural tendency to climb. Cultivars like ‘Congo Apple’ are self-heading but remain within the same genus.
Propagation and size
- Propagation: best achieved through basal offsets or stem cuttings.
- Medium: sphagnum moss or fine bark/perlite blends encourage strong root growth.
- Indoor size: typically 60 – 100 cm tall, making it manageable for homes and offices.
Why Philodendron 'Congo Apple' is a must-have
With fresh apple-green new leaves, a compact upright form, and a forgiving nature, Philodendron 'Congo Apple' is an easy yet highly decorative hybrid. Ideal for both beginners seeking a reliable plant and collectors building a diverse philodendron lineup.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 18 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
The best "Jesus book" outside the Bible
Format: Kindle
If you are looking for a dry academic tome that spends page after page delving into the minutiae of little known biblical passages, you need to look someplace else. If, however you are looking for a fresh, dynamic and eye opening book tackling the big questions about who Jesus claimed to be, the reliability and authorship of the Gospels, and other questions surrounding the life and ministry of Jesus, then this is the book for you.
Written by a well respected academic but for a non-specialist readership, Dr. Pitre's writing is engaging while not being breezy. He uses footnotes to back up his assertions but not so many as to overwhelm the reader. Don't get me wrong, I like a weighty academic tome as well as the next nerd. I would strongly recommend one of Dr. Joshua R. Brotherton's books.
But nerds aren't Dr. Pitre's only intended audience. It's all of us who have been bombarded with claims that the gospels are unreliable and anonymous, written well after the lifetime of the Apostles. That Jesus never claimed to be divine or that the resurrection is nothing more than myth. It addresses these and other issues in a way that makes you resolve to buy copies of his book for family and friends even before you're halfway through the book. I know I did and I bet you will to.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2024
★★★★★ 5
An Excellent Summary Defending The Synoptic Gospels and Jesus Christ's Claims of Divinity
Format: Hardcover
This book is an excellent summary that refutes the arguments made by modern theologians and scholars of the Bible that claim that the Gospels were of anonymous authorship, written late in the 1st Century AD, and Jesus of Nazareth never claimed to be divine. Bart Ehrman's (an avowed atheist that seems motivated to denigrate Christianity) shoddy scholarship is frequently given as an example to be refuted.
The author cites the Apostolic Fathers and more recent scholars to show that the claims made by the revisionists are incorrect. There are several detailed 5 Star reviews, so I won't duplicate their praises for Dr. Pitre's book.
The book is a quick read and there are numerous end notes. A minor criticism is that the book lacks a bibliography, but the sources are fully identified within the end notes. The author makes a couple of very interesting observations concerning the Transfiguration of Jesus and how Jesus fulfilled Scripture (namely, the Book of Jonah) that I had not considered before.
One of the negative reviews cites the notes in the New American Bible as evidence that Dr. Pitre's book is incorrect. While it is true that the Catholic Church in the U.S. uses the NAB translation in its liturgy, other Biblical scholars dispute the notes included in that edition of the Bible. A similar problem exists with the notes included with Oxford's Catholic Study Bible. The notes were written by modern revisionists.
I suppose you have to decide whether to accept the words of the Apostolic Fathers (i.e., men that either were or knew the Apostles) and Jesus Christ, or if -- 2000 years later -- you're too sophisticated to accept the word of some ancient guys.
The author is Catholic, and the book has been granted an Imprimatur. However, since this book does not get into the weeds concerning doctrinal differences, it should be of value to any Christian.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 15, 2024
★★★★★ 4
Good but more academic
Format: Hardcover
I love Brant Pitre, especially his books Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist and Jesus the Bridegroom. I would say those books should be required reading for anyone who is catechist or is involved in RCIA as Catholics. This book is good, however it is primarily an academic work where Dr. Pitre takes on the Historical Jesus movement and Dr. Bart Ehrman in particular. In this book he goes on to show that the gospels were written within a few decades of Jesus death by the disciples that have given their names to the gospels. He uses his knowledge of Jewish faith and culture to show that Jesus really does claim to be God in all the gospels, not just the Gospel of John. It is a good book but not one that I would find useful on a regular basis.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2016
★★★★★ 5
BEST BOOK IN 20 YEARS
Format: Hardcover
BEST BOOK that I have read in 20 years. This should be required reading in Christian schools. Every Christian who has graduated from high school should read this book. As one who has studied Church History, Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek myself, I had become very disappointed in what passes as scholarship, even among Ivy Leage graduates, in the 21st century. HOWEVER, Dr. Pitre's book is a great encouragement that there really are people "out-there" that display genuine scholarship. With Appreciation, Russ Hills, Ph.D.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2026
★★★★★ 5
A Case for Jesus' Divine Self-Conception
Format: Kindle
This is a very meticulously reasoned argument attempting to show that Jesus had a Divine self-conception. That is, Jesus believed, and claimed, that he was God.
Pitre begins by posing C.S. Lewis’ famous “trilemma” to the reader. If Jesus claimed to be God, we have three ways to respond – he was either a Liar, Lunatic, or Lord. Pitre’s work in this book strives to bring us back, face to face, with this trilemma. To accomplish this, Pitre needs to defeat another popular notion in the modern mind – that Jesus, or at least much of the Gospel material about him, was a “Legend.” If Pitre can show that Jesus did, in fact, historically claim Divinity, we will be forced to respond to his claim and answer Jesus’ own question for ourselves – “Who do you say that I am?”
To accomplish this Pitre first attempts to show that the Gospels are historically reliable. He believes that, contrary to modern scholarly opinion, the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they have been attributed to (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), that they were intended to portray historically accurate biographical pictures of Jesus, and that they were written much more closely to the time of Jesus than liberal scholars assume (Pitre tentatively dates the synoptic Gospels all before the destruction of the Temple in AD 70). These three pieces of evidence – authorship, intent, and dating – all lead Pitre to the conclusion that the Gospels give us historically accurate information about Jesus.
After setting the stage by arguing for the accuracy of our sources, Pitre delves into the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and tries to show that although it is not always explicit (i.e. Jesus doesn’t say “I am God, worship Me.”) even the synoptics portray Jesus as claiming Divinity. Using evidence such as Jesus’ use of the titles “Son of Man” and “I Am,” prophesy from the book of Daniel, Jesus’ “stilling of the storm,” the transfiguration, the pronouncement of the forgiveness of the parlytic’s sins, the riddle about the Son of David being David’s “Lord,”, the crucifixion, and the resurrection, Pitre makes his case. In the end, he believes that not only do the Gospel authors portray Jesus as Divine, but that these claims came from Jesus himself.
Thus we are led, full circle, back to the trilemma. We can call Jesus Liar, Lunatic, or Lord, but not, according to Pitre, a Legend.
This was a really interesting read from a conservative scholar. His exegesis of many Gospel passages illuminate how the Hebrew Scriptures provide a much needed backdrop for understanding each story. The Gospels are much more nuanced than we might first think and oftentimes one saying or image may evoke whole passages or concepts from the Old Testament that would have been apparent to early Jewish readers. As Pitre argues, understanding the Jewish context of the synoptic authors helps in understanding their Christology.
In the end, I agree with Pitre that the Gospels are generally more historically accurate than “mainstream” scholars give them credit for. I think it’s plausible that the Gospel titles reveal their true authors and that they were written fairly early after Jesus’ death (before the fall of Jerusalem). I also agree that the Synoptics may implicitly ascribe Divinity to Jesus – although I don’t think that is an open and shut case. If there were more explicit cases in the synoptic Gospels where Jesus claimed Divinity, it would help his case. It still seems to me the only explicit sayings we have come from the Gospel of John, which even Pitre doesn’t seem to argue is historically reliable (at least he doesn’t focus on this in the book).
It’s probably outside the scope of this book, but I would have loved to see Pitre address the idea of Jesus as Apocalyptic Prophet. He interacts with several scholars who accept this notion (EP Sanders, Dale Allison, Bart Ehrman, John Meier) and it’s a viable option in the world of Historical Jesus scholarship. I think it’s a relevant topic in all discussions surrounding a Historical Jesus and can be a large factor in how one answers the question of Jesus’ identity.
This study is worth reading regardless of your theological persuasion, and Pitre’s arguments deserve serious consideration.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2016